![]() The Fitbit Ionic – and its sportier cousin the Fitbit Ionic Adidas Edition – is going head-to-head with the Apple Watch Series 3, and while it doesn't have LTE to offer, it has the upper hand in some other areas. But like saying Voldemort's name, Fitbit refuses to use the word smartwatch when talking about the Blaze, presumably for fear that market analysts would then compare shipments against the Apple Watch.īut now, it's game on. In a sense, the Ionic is the archetype of a trend we're seeing in which fitness trackers and smartwatches blur together.Īfter all, many would call the Fitbit Blaze a smartwatch, and you wouldn't be wrong. It's rated at up to 10 hours tracking for GPS - that would probably be under ideal conditions.Neither the Apple Watch, nor any member of the Wear OS watch congregation can claim to do this to the same degree right now. I think you'll also find that you'll need to be recharging your Ionic quite frequently if you're using the GPS for extended periods of time. Your use case is certainly not one I would suspect was accounted for in the design of a "fitness tracker". ![]() It would be unfortunate to not have the data you expect to be present at the end of the trip. So if your hiking is close now for departure I would probably forgo the OS update if it's presented on your phone would suggest testing this use case before travelling and relying on an unproven solution. Parallel to all of this we have a planned selected release release of OS 3.0. I would be getting answers from the Forum on pausing a GPS exercise, because there was/is an issue and I don't know what was resolved because users were losing their tracking data. I have the Ionic as well, and for comfort I had the Ionic GPS going as well as Mobiletrack on another email account to compare my GPS results. I would add more testing as well as is suggesting ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |